Boeing Shares Drop Following Workers' Rejection of Latest Contract Offer

Boeing shares dropped on Thursday following the rejection of the company’s latest contract offer by striking workers, raising concerns over the planemaker’s financial stability and its ability to restore its reputation. Approximately 64% of Boeing’s West Coast factory workers turned down the deal, halting production for most of the company’s commercial aircraft, including the crucial 737 MAX model.

The rejection caused Boeing shares to fall by more than 2%, while key suppliers like Spirit AeroSystems saw a nearly 4% drop amid warnings of possible layoffs and furloughs. Honeywell CEO Vimal Kapur called the situation “challenging” and unfortunate, as the strike's impact ripples across the aerospace sector.

The rejected contract proposal included a 35% wage increase over four years but lacked a defined pension plan, which has been a significant demand from the striking workers. The dispute over pension benefits, which were removed a decade ago to preserve jobs in Washington state, has cast doubt on how long the strike could last, with rating agencies like S&P Global watching closely for a potential credit downgrade for Boeing.

Ben Tsocanos, aerospace director at S&P Global Ratings, warned that an extended strike could intensify Boeing’s financial woes and increase the likelihood of a downgrade. Analysts believe Boeing is unlikely to reinstate the pension plan due to its high cost. However, others argue the company will need to offer a better deal to avoid further delays and expenses.

Nick Cunningham, an analyst at Agency Partners, suggested Boeing will have to make a higher offer, as it’s not in a strong position to prolong the standoff. Bank of America analyst Ron Epstein echoed this, predicting further wage concessions will be necessary to end the strike, which has now stretched into its 40th day.

As the strike continues, Boeing’s first major labor stoppage in 16 years has led Wall Street analysts to speculate on how the dispute over pensions and wages will unfold. Some believe that increasing the wage offer to meet the union’s 40% demand could resolve the issue. However, online discussions show workers remain divided, with some machinists determined to press on, citing long-standing grievances over the pension deal made a decade ago.

Boeing’s ongoing cash burn, compounded by the strike, is muddying efforts to secure refinancing to stabilize operations. The company recently filed paperwork to raise as much as $25 billion to avoid a credit downgrade and also secured a $10 billion credit line. While some analysts believe Boeing would prefer to wait until after the strike to tap the market, the pressure to resolve the labor dispute is mounting.

JPMorgan analyst Seth Seifman noted that a capital raise before the strike’s resolution can’t be ruled out, depending on market conditions. Boeing’s struggles come on the heels of multiple crises, including safety issues, quality concerns, and industry-wide shortages of parts and labor, overshadowing a reported $6 billion loss for the third quarter.

Boeing leadership, led by Chief Financial Officer Brian West, has acknowledged that the company is likely to continue bleeding cash into 2025. As Boeing works to regain its competitive edge against European rival Airbus, executives have outlined a recovery plan but warned that the turnaround will take time.

Doctors Withhold Puberty Blockers Study Over Concerns It Could Be ‘Weaponized’ 

A researcher funded by the federal government to study the effects of puberty blockers on transgender youth has chosen not to publish the findings, fearing the results could be "weaponized" against gender-transition treatments for minors.

Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, the medical director at the Center for Transyouth Health and Development at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, began her study in 2015 as part of a larger project on transgender health, which received $9.7 million in funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The study focused on 95 adolescents, averaging 11 years old, who were treated with puberty blockers.

After two years, the research found little to no change in the mental health of the adolescents who received the treatment. Despite this, Dr. Olson-Kennedy has not released the study results, expressing concerns over how the data could be misused.

“I do not want our work to be weaponized,” Dr. Olson-Kennedy told The New York Times. “It has to be exactly on point, clear, and concise. And that takes time.”

The delay in publishing the study’s results has sparked a heated debate, with critics accusing the researcher and the NIH of prioritizing activism over science. Camilo Ortiz, a clinical psychology professor at Long Island University, voiced frustration on social media platform X, stating, “This is not science. This is activism and the NIH should not be funding it. A real scientist accepts what the data show and has an allegiance to the truth.”

Dr. Olson-Kennedy expressed concern that if the results were made public, opponents of puberty blockers might argue that the drugs are ineffective, using the study to bolster claims that they shouldn’t be prescribed to transgender youth.

An NIH spokesperson confirmed that it is up to researchers to determine when and how to publish their findings, though they are encouraged to share results of federally funded studies.

The debate over gender-transition care for minors has intensified across the U.S., with 22 states enacting bans on gender-transition drugs and surgeries for minors, and two others banning only surgeries. As the political and medical debate continues, Dr. Olson-Kennedy’s decision to withhold the study has only added to the controversy surrounding gender-affirming care.

This situation highlights ongoing tensions between scientific research and activism, as well as the complexities involved in publicizing findings that can influence both medical practice and political policy.

E. Coli Outbreak Linked to McDonald's Quarter Pounder Leads to One Death, Dozens Sickened Across U.S.

A deadly E. coli outbreak tied to McDonald’s popular Quarter Pounder hamburgers has claimed one life and left dozens of others ill across 10 U.S. states, with Colorado being the hardest hit. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that 49 people have been affected, with 26 cases in Colorado alone. Ten individuals have been hospitalized due to severe infections caused by the E. coli O157 strain

Strain

The outbreak has sparked concerns over McDonald’s food safety standards, especially regarding its Quarter Pounder. Investigations are focused on two potential sources of contamination: fresh slivered onions and fresh beef patties, both used in the Quarter Pounder and distributed by a single supplier serving three distribution centers. As a precaution, McDonald’s has voluntarily removed these ingredients from its restaurants in the affected regions, including Colorado, Kansas, Utah, and Wyoming.

The E. coli O157

strain is notorious for causing serious illness. This strain was also responsible for the infamous 1993 Jack in the Box outbreak, which resulted in the deaths of four children. Foodborne illness lawyer Bill Marler, who represented a victim from the 1993 case, warns that more illnesses could still emerge from this McDonald’s outbreak.

The CDC’s investigation revealed that every person interviewed had consumed McDonald’s food before falling ill, with most reporting eating the Quarter Pounder specifically. Although no definitive ingredient has been confirmed as the source of contamination, McDonald’s is working with suppliers to ensure the safety of its products. The fast-food giant has also temporarily halted the sale of Quarter Pounders in the impacted states while the investigation continues.

McDonald’s, the world’s largest fast-food chain, saw its shares dip by 6% following news of the outbreak. Industry experts are predicting that the incident could also impact U.S. cattle futures by reducing demand for beef. Meanwhile, concerns about potential lawsuits loom as McDonald’s grapples with the fallout from this public health crisis.

E. coli symptoms include severe stomach cramps, diarrhea, and vomiting, with symptoms typically appearing three to four days after exposure. The CDC has advised customers who have recently consumed McDonald’s Quarter Pounders in the affected states to be vigilant for signs of illness.

The E. coli outbreak in McDonald’s recalls the food safety issues faced by Chipotle in 2015, which severely damaged the burrito chain’s sales and reputation. Like Chipotle’s outbreak, McDonald’s is now facing scrutiny over its food safety practices as the CDC continues its investigation.

Affected states include Colorado, Nebraska, Utah, Wyoming, Kansas, Missouri, Oregon, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Montana. McDonald’s has expressed its commitment to cooperating fully with health officials to resolve the issue and restore customer confidence.

 How to Find Your Polling Place for Voting This November 2024

As the November 2024 election approaches, millions of Americans are preparing to cast their votes in critical races that will shape the future of the country. Whether you're voting for president, congressional representatives, local officials, or ballot measures, one of the most important steps is knowing where to vote. Finding your polling place is essential for a smooth voting experience, and fortunately, there are several simple ways to locate it.

Here’s a guide to help you find your polling place and ensure you're ready for Election Day:

1. Check Your Voter Registration Status

Before you head to the polls, it’s a good idea to check your voter registration status. This step helps ensure you’re registered and that your information is up-to-date. Your polling place is typically assigned based on your current address, so if you’ve moved recently, it’s crucial to update your voter registration.

You can check your registration status online using resources like:

Vote.org (www.vote.org)

National Association of Secretaries of State (www.canivote.org)

State Election Websites (Each state has its own website with tools to verify registration and find your polling place)

If your registration is out-of-date or incorrect, most states have options to update your information online or at local election offices.

2. Use Polling Place Locator Tools

Many nonpartisan organizations and government agencies offer polling place locator tools that allow you to easily find your assigned polling location by entering your address. Some trusted resources include:

Vote.org Polling Place Locator: One of the simplest and most widely used tools. Just enter your home address, and it will display your polling place location and hours.

Google Election Tools: Simply searching “Where is my polling place?” on Google will often show an interactive tool at the top of your search results.

State Election Websites: Each state’s election website often includes an official polling place lookup tool, which may provide additional details such as early voting locations and voter ID requirements.

3. Check Your Voter Information Card

If you’ve received a voter information card in the mail, it usually contains important details about where and when you can vote. These cards are typically mailed out several weeks before an election and include the address of your designated polling place.

If you haven’t received one or misplaced it, don’t worry. You can still find your polling place online using the resources mentioned above.

4. Contact Your Local Election Office

If you’re having trouble finding your polling place online, contacting your local election office can help. They can provide the most accurate and up-to-date information. You can find contact details for your local election office by visiting your state’s election website or the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s directory (www.eac.gov).

5. Look for Early Voting Locations

Many states offer early voting as an option to avoid the crowds on Election Day. Early voting sites may differ from your assigned polling place for Election Day, so it’s important to check the specific locations and hours. You can typically find early voting locations through your state’s election website or by using the tools mentioned earlier.

6. Confirm Polling Place Hours

Polling place hours vary by state and locality, so make sure to check when the polls open and close in your area. Most polling places are open from early morning until evening, but it’s always a good idea to confirm these hours in advance. If you’re in line when the polls close, you are still legally entitled to vote, so don’t leave if the line is long!

7. Know What to Bring

Once you’ve found your polling place, make sure you’re prepared with any necessary documents. Some states require voters to show a government-issued ID, while others may have less strict requirements. Double-check your state’s voter ID laws so you can bring the correct identification to avoid any issues at the polling place.

8. Plan Ahead for Accessibility

If you or someone in your household has a disability or requires special accommodations, your polling place should provide accessible voting options. Contact your local election office to confirm the accessibility features of your polling location, and inquire about curbside voting or other services that may be available.

9. Consider Alternative Voting Methods

If you can’t make it to your polling place on Election Day, many states offer absentee voting or vote-by-mail options. Be sure to check the deadlines for requesting and submitting a mail-in ballot, as they can vary depending on your location.

Finding your polling place is a crucial step in making sure your voice is heard in the 2024 election. Whether you’re voting in person on Election Day, taking advantage of early voting, or using an alternative method like absentee voting, being prepared will make your voting experience smoother and more efficient.

With the future of the country at stake, every vote matters. Make sure to verify your polling place today, so you can cast your ballot with confidence this November!

 Labor Day 2024: A Celebration of American Workers

Labor Day, a federal holiday observed on the first Monday of September, is a time to honor the social and economic achievements of American workers.

 Rooted in the late 19th-century labor movement, this holiday commemorates the hard work and dedication of millions of individuals who have contributed to the nation's growth and prosperity.   

History of Labor Day

The origins of Labor Day can be traced back to the 1880s when labor unions were gaining momentum in the United States. In an effort to recognize the contributions of workers and promote their rights, labor activists began advocating for a dedicated day to celebrate the American workforce. The first official Labor Day celebration was held in New York City in 1882.   

Significance of Labor Day

Labor Day serves as a reminder of the vital role that workers have played in shaping the American economy and society. It is a time to reflect on the struggles and triumphs of the labor movement, from the fight for fair wages and safe working conditions to the establishment of unions and collective bargaining rights.   

Labor Day Traditions

Labor Day has become synonymous with summer barbecues, picnics, and outdoor gatherings. Families and friends often gather to enjoy delicious food, games, and fireworks. Many communities also host parades and festivals to celebrate the holiday.   

Labor Day is a time to honor the American workforce and the countless contributions that workers have made to our nation. It is a day to celebrate the achievements of the labor movement and to recommit ourselves to the principles of fairness, equity, and justice for all workers.   

 U.S. Officials Warn of Increased Terrorist Threats

In January 2023, Christine Abizaid, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), warned that the U.S. faces threats from both foreign terrorist organizations like ISIS and al Qaeda, as well as state sponsors and lone wolf actors. While the most immediate threat comes from individuals inspired by jihadist groups, Abizaid emphasized the need for vigilance against foreign terrorist organizations, particularly al Qaeda and ISIS.

 Celebrating National Dog Day: August 26th, 2024

Every year on August 26th, dog lovers across the United States come together to celebrate National Dog Day, a special day dedicated to our loyal, four-legged friends. Whether they're snuggled up on the couch, eagerly awaiting playtime, or serving as heroic service dogs, our canine companions bring joy, comfort, and love into our lives. National Dog Day is the perfect opportunity to show appreciation for everything they do.

A Brief History of National Dog Day

National Dog Day was founded in 2004 by animal advocate and pet lifestyle expert Colleen Paige. Paige established this day not only to honor dogs but also to raise awareness about the many dogs that need rescuing each year. August 26th holds a special significance for Paige, as it marks the day she adopted her first dog, "Sheltie," when she was just 10 years old.

Since its inception, National Dog Day has grown into a widely recognized celebration. It serves as a reminder of the countless ways dogs enrich our lives, from companionship and security to their roles in search-and-rescue missions and therapy services. The day also highlights the importance of responsible pet ownership, encouraging people to adopt dogs from shelters and rescues instead of purchasing them from pet stores or breeders.

Ways to Celebrate National Dog Day 2024

1. Adopt, Don’t Shop: One of the best ways to honor National Dog Day is to open your home to a dog in need. Visit your local animal shelter or rescue organization and consider adopting a dog. If adoption isn’t an option, consider fostering or volunteering.

2. Spoil Your Pup: Show your furry friend some extra love with a new toy, a special treat, or a trip to their favorite park. Whether it’s a long walk, a play session, or simply some extra belly rubs, your dog will appreciate the attention.

3. Donate to a Dog Shelter: Support your local animal shelter by donating money, food, blankets, or toys. Many shelters also appreciate donations of time—volunteering can make a big difference in the lives of dogs waiting for their forever homes.

4. Share the Love on Social Media: Use the hashtag #NationalDogDay to share photos and stories of your dog on social media. This not only spreads joy but also raises awareness about the importance of dog adoption and rescue.

5. Learn About Dog Care: Take some time to learn more about proper dog care. Whether it’s understanding their nutritional needs, training techniques, or health care, being a knowledgeable dog owner helps ensure your furry friend lives a happy, healthy life.

The Impact of Dogs on Our Lives

Dogs have been human companions for thousands of years, evolving from their wild ancestors into the loyal friends we know today. They provide unconditional love and are known for their ability to uplift our spirits. Dogs can reduce stress, increase physical activity, and even improve heart health. For those who live alone, dogs provide companionship that can combat loneliness.

Working dogs, such as guide dogs, police dogs, and therapy dogs, perform tasks that significantly impact human lives. They can assist people with disabilities, help law enforcement, and provide comfort to those in need. National Dog Day is an opportunity to recognize these incredible contributions and honor the special bond between humans and dogs.

Looking Forward to National Dog Day 2024

As we prepare to celebrate National Dog Day on August 26th, 2024, let's remember the countless ways dogs enhance our lives. Whether you're a long-time dog owner or just a fan of these wonderful animals, this day is a chance to celebrate all things canine. So, mark your calendar, plan some fun activities, and get ready to show your dog just how much they mean to you!

 Walmart Recalls Apple Juice in 25 States Due to Elevated Arsenic Levels

Walmart has initiated a recall of nearly 10,000 cases of apple juice sold in its stores across the United States, following the discovery of potentially harmful levels of inorganic arsenic in the product.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) heightened the urgency of the recall on Friday after initially announcing it on August 15. The updated classification indicates that the affected apple juice may cause temporary adverse health effects, although it is unlikely to result in serious or long-term medical issues.

The recall involves 9,535 cases of Great Value brand apple juice sold in 25 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia. The recall was voluntarily initiated by Refresco Beverages US Inc., a Florida-based manufacturer after the company identified elevated levels of the chemical contaminant that surpassed industry standards in the six-packs of 8-ounce (227-gram) juice bottles.

Refresco still needs to respond to requests for comment.

"The health and safety of our customers is always a top priority," said Walmart spokesperson Molly Blakeman. "We have removed this product from our affected stores and are collaborating with the supplier to conduct a thorough investigation."

According to the National Institutes of Health, inorganic and organic arsenic are traceable in many food products. Routine testing is conducted since even slightly elevated levels of these compounds can lead to symptoms such as vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, numbness, and muscle cramping.

The FDA notes that inorganic arsenic, which is more toxic than the naturally occurring organic form, poses a greater health risk. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified inorganic arsenic as a carcinogen, a substance that can cause cancer.

Despite the elevated levels found in the recalled apple juice bottles, the FDA does not anticipate severe health consequences from this exposure. So far, the FDA has not received any reports of illnesses related to the apple juice recall.

 Oregon Offers $30K Grant for First-Time Homebuyers — But Only for Non-Citizens

First-time homebuyers in Oregon can now apply for a taxpayer-funded $30,000 grant to help with down payments. However, there's a catch: only non-U.S. citizens are eligible for this financial assistance.

The grant is being promoted by the Hacienda Community Development Corporation, a Latino-led housing support group based in Portland. Their Camino a Casa program specifically states that the grant is “only for people who are not American citizens.”

The organization’s approach includes working closely with clients through financial coaching and offering workshops on mortgage readiness and financial fitness. “Clients work closely with financial coaches and HUD-certified housing counselors throughout the entirety of the home buying process,” says Hacienda. “In addition to mortgage readiness and financial fitness workshops, we provide various opportunities for down-payment assistance.”

This initiative has sparked controversy, with Republican Oregon state Representative Ed Diehl criticizing it as “state-sponsored discrimination.” He expressed his concern over the use of taxpayer money, saying, “I am appalled that the hard-earned, limited tax dollars of Oregonians are being used to prioritize home ownership for certain non-U.S. citizens,” as reported by the Daily Caller.

The grant funding is part of the state’s Economic Equity Investment Program, which aims to promote economic equity for disadvantaged groups. Hacienda received a $692,775 allocation from this program.

In response to these developments, Republican lawmakers in Oregon are taking action to repeal some of the state’s sanctuary laws, reflecting ongoing political tensions in the predominantly Democratic state. 

 Baltimore City Approves $1 Program to Sell Vacant Homes

Baltimore officials have approved a new program that enables the sale of city-owned vacant homes for just one dollar. The Board of Estimates voted in favor of the initiative on Wednesday morning, as reported by USA Today.

 Rep. Crockett at DNC: 'Kamala Harris Brings Experience; Donald Trump Brings Legal Troubles'

At a recent event hosted by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Representative Jasmine Crockett didn't mince words when comparing Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump.

"Kamala Harris has a wealth of experience and a proven track record of public service," Crockett stated. "In contrast, Donald Trump is facing a growing list of legal challenges and criminal accusations."

Rep. Crockett praised Vice President Harris for her accomplishments and dedication to the American people, highlighting her career as a senator and attorney general. "Kamala Harris has a résumé that reflects her commitment to justice and progress," she added.

In sharp contrast, Crockett pointed out the legal issues Trump is currently facing. "While Kamala is working to build a better future for all Americans, Trump is busy dealing with a rap sheet that keeps getting longer."

Crockett's remarks underscored the stark differences between the two political figures, emphasizing the importance of experience and integrity in leadership.

 Manhunt Underway After Convicted Murderer Escapes in North Carolina

Hundreds of law enforcement officers are actively searching for Ramone Alston, a 30-year-old convicted murderer, who escaped from custody after being transported to a hospital in North Carolina, according to the state’s Department of Adult Correction.

Alston, who was serving a life sentence, managed to break free from a prison transport vehicle on Tuesday morning. The incident occurred at around 7 a.m. at the U.N.C. Hospitals Hillsborough Campus, where Alston was brought for a medical appointment. According to authorities, Alston freed himself from his leg restraints while still handcuffed and made a dash into nearby woods as soon as the vehicle door was opened.

By midday Wednesday, the search had expanded to cover 1,335 acres, involving 335 law enforcement officers from 19 different agencies, as reported by Keith Acree, the department’s communications director.

Though officers were armed when Alston escaped, they did not fire, as the escape happened too quickly, Acree explained.

Kirby Saunders, the emergency services director for Orange County, assured the public that Alston is no longer believed to be in the immediate area, reducing the imminent threat to the community. However, authorities suspect that Alston may have received assistance in his escape, though they have not provided specific details. A $35,000 reward for information has generated numerous tips, with two considered particularly promising, according to Orange County Sheriff Charles S. Blackwood.

Despite no direct evidence suggesting Alston is armed, officials warn that he should be considered dangerous and believe he has likely removed his handcuffs by now.

Alston was convicted in 2018 for his role in a 2015 shooting that tragically killed a 1-year-old girl on Christmas Day. Although his lawyers argued that Alston did not fire the fatal shot, he was sentenced to life in prison and was being held at Bertie Correctional Institution, over 100 miles from the Hillsborough medical campus.

James D. Williams Jr., a Durham-based lawyer who represented Alston during the 2015 investigation, stated that he had not been in contact with Alston and learned about the escape from news reports.

Questions have been raised about why Alston was taken to a medical facility so far from his prison. Acree explained that the Hillsborough campus was chosen because the appointment was a follow-up with a specific provider at that location, and the transfer was necessary due to medical requirements.

Details about the ongoing search remain limited, as law enforcement is cautious about revealing too much information publicly. Officials acknowledge that Alston may have already left the state.

“The ground search phase is winding down,” Acree stated during a Wednesday press conference, indicating that the focus will now shift to investigating leads and tips. When captured, Alston is expected to be placed in a maximum-security facility, likely Central Prison in Raleigh.

 Will Kamala Harris’ Polling Lead Hold? A Polling Expert Weighs In

Kamala Harris is enjoying the momentum of a new candidacy, which has quickly pushed her into the lead.

Just three weeks into her campaign, the vice president has seen a surge in support, closing a gap that Joe Biden struggled to overcome during his run. However, the question remains: how stable is this lead?

It’s been an extraordinary month in American politics, where any single major event would typically create a temporary shift in the polls. Events like the July 13 assassination attempt on Donald Trump, the Republican convention, Trump’s selection of a running mate, Biden’s exit from the presidential race, andHarris’s choice of vice-presidential candidate have all played a role. But untangling the impact of each event to determine the true state of the race is challenging, and with the Democratic convention on the horizon, more changes could be imminent.

How has the race evolved at a deeper level? And if Trump regains the lead, what indicators will signal that shift before it’s reflected in the top-line polling?

A flood of surveys in the coming days will start to shed light on these questions, followed by two intense months of polling. Several key metrics have supportedHarris’s early success: her rising favorability ratings and Trump’s shrinking lead on the economy, a core issue for the former president.

“Presidential campaigns are marathons, but this one has turned into a sprint,” said Neil Newhouse, Mitt Romney’s lead pollster during his 2012 presidential bid. “That tends to benefit the candidate who’s new on the scene.”

Here are five critical metrics to watch, beyond the top-line polling, to gauge the true state of the race:

Kamala Harris’ Favorability Rating

June 27: 39% (RealClearPolitics average)

Now: 45%

Voters are beginning to see Harris in a different light since she became the Democratic presidential candidate.

Over the past three years, Harris has faced a significant gap between those who view her favorably and those with an unfavorable opinion. That gap is now closing. A recent New York Times/Siena College poll showed that, in key battleground states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, 50% of likely voters viewed her favorably, compared to 48% unfavorably.

However, this favorable perception might not last. Trump’s campaign has launched a wave of advertisements in battleground states, portraying Harris as “dangerously liberal,” which could negatively affect her favorability, especially as her record comes under closer scrutiny in the weeks following her campaign launch.

“Image is a precursor to ballot change,” Newhouse noted. “You’ll see her image shift before the polling numbers do, with her unfavorability ratings, particularly the strong ones, potentially rising.”

Trump, too, is enjoying a high-water mark in favorability — the best since the 2020 election — following the assassination attempt and the Republican convention. This suggests that his numbers could also decline to more typical, less favorable levels.

“With Kamala Harris, it’s like ‘A Star is Born,’” said Mark Mellman, lead pollster for then-Senator John Kerry in the 2004 presidential race. “It’s real, it’s natural, but it’s not necessarily permanent. It’s possible that both candidates’ favorability ratings could dip a bit over time.”

Since Harris replaced Biden as the Democratic nominee, the percentage of voters indicating support for one of the three independent or third-party candidates — Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Cornel West, or Jill Stein — has nearly halved.

While this is technically part of the broader polling picture, it also highlights a unique aspect of this election: more voters, fueled by Harris’s rise in popularity and Trump’s post-assassination and post-conviction boost in favorability, are inclined to support the main candidates. This is a shift from earlier in the race when up to a quarter of voters expressed dissatisfaction with both Biden and Trump.

 Harris Proposes Major Tax Relief for Families Welcoming a New Baby

Vice President Kamala Harris is set to introduce an ambitious economic plan aimed at easing the financial burden on American families by addressing key expenses such as housing, groceries, and child-rearing costs. 

A central feature of the plan is a significant expansion of the child tax credit. Under Harris's proposal, low- and middle-income families could receive up to $6,000 for each new baby, alongside the restoration of the pandemic-era benefit that provided up to $3,600 per child. This move aligns with Republican proposals, including one from Vice Presidential candidate Sen. JD Vance, who has suggested a $5,000 child tax credit.

While President Joe Biden has faced challenges in gaining recognition for his economic policies, particularly in reducing prices, polls indicate that Harris fares better in voter confidence on economic issues. During a campaign stop in Las Vegas on August 10, Harris acknowledged the ongoing issue of high grocery prices, stating, "While our economy is doing well by many measures, prices for everyday things like groceries are still too high. You know it and I know it."

Harris's plan also targets housing affordability. In Raleigh, North Carolina, she will deliver her campaign's first major policy address, where she plans to propose tax incentives that could lead to the construction of 3 million new housing units within four years. This exceeds the Biden administration's current proposal of 2 million new and renovated homes. Harris's proposal includes unspecified tax breaks for homebuilders focusing on first-time buyers and affordable rentals, along with a $40 billion fund to support local governments in financing housing developments, doubling the Biden administration's $20 billion proposal.

Additionally, Harris will advocate for a $25,000 down payment assistance program for first-time homeowners, which could benefit over 4 million buyers. This plan is more generous than Biden's State of the Union proposal, which offered a $10,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers.

On the corporate front, Harris will emphasize her commitment to challenging corporations that profit excessively from consumers. Drawing from her experience as California's attorney general, she will pledge to fight corporate price gouging, particularly by landlords and pharmaceutical companies. Harris plans to propose an extension of the $35 insulin price cap to all Americans, not just seniors, and a $2,000 cap on out-of-pocket prescription drug costs.

Harris's campaign also indicates she will support legislation restricting tax breaks for corporate investors purchasing homes and banning the use of algorithmic data by rental property owners to increase rent prices. Regarding grocery prices, Harris will advocate for a federal ban on price gouging in the food sector, with a particular focus on meat prices. She will argue that the concentrated meat processing industry is a significant factor driving up grocery costs and commit to more aggressive investigations and prosecutions of price-fixing in the meat supply chain.

The plan also proposes empowering the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general with the authority to investigate and penalize corporations that keep grocery prices high instead of passing savings to consumers. Additionally, Harris's administration would scrutinize mergers in the food sector to ensure they do not lead to higher grocery prices.

 Columbia University President Steps Down Amid Controversy Over Israel-Gaza Protests

Minouche Shafik, Columbia University’s President, has resigned, marking the end of a brief and contentious tenure characterized by significant unrest and criticism over her management of pro-Palestinian protests on campus earlier this year.

Shafik’s decision to bring New York police onto campus twice during the protests—once to dismantle a Gaza solidarity encampment and again to clear students occupying a building—sparked widespread backlash. In May, a group of faculty expressed a vote of no confidence in her leadership, accusing her of infringing on students' rights and academic freedom.

In an email to the Columbia community on Wednesday night, Shafik announced her immediate resignation, citing the challenges of navigating a deeply divided campus environment. She noted that recent events had taken a heavy toll on her family, as well as the broader community.

Reflecting on her decision, Shafik wrote, “I have concluded that stepping aside at this juncture is the best way for Columbia to move forward in addressing the challenges ahead.”

The Board of Trustees, in a separate communication, stated that they had “reluctantly” accepted Shafik’s resignation and named Katrina Armstrong, the CEO of Columbia’s Irving Medical Center, as the interim president. The trustees expressed confidence in Armstrong’s ability to lead the university through this transitional period.

Shafik, an economist originally from Egypt, was the first woman to serve as Columbia’s president since its founding. Her tenure, however, quickly became fraught with difficulties. Just a few months into her presidency, the October 7 Hamas attack ignited the Israel-Gaza conflict, leading to widespread protests on Columbia’s campus, mirroring similar demonstrations across the country.

Columbia’s handling of these protests drew intense scrutiny. Congress launched an investigation into the university’s alleged failure to protect Jewish students, compelling Shafik to testify before a House committee on issues related to antisemitism. The U.S. Department of Education also initiated an inquiry into claims of both Islamophobia and antisemitism on campus.

The situation further escalated when three Columbia deans resigned earlier this month after Shafik reprimanded them for sending text messages containing what was described as “ancient antisemitic tropes” during an event focused on Jewish life.

Shafik’s departure marks the third resignation of an Ivy League president since the House Education and Workforce Committee began its hearings on university leaders’ responses to campus pro-Palestinian protests. These hearings saw intense questioning of university policies, rule enforcement, and public statements.

At Columbia, Shafik faced a difficult balancing act: Some students and faculty urged her to protect protesters’ rights to free expression, citing Columbia’s long-standing tradition of student activism, from Vietnam War protests to more recent movements like divestment from private prisons. After Shafik’s initial call for police intervention, 70 students and faculty members signed an open letter accusing her of “violating our community’s values.”

On the other side, Republican lawmakers pressured Shafik to crack down on what they described as hateful and hostile protests against Jewish students. Representative Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) criticized Shafik in a May letter, accusing her of allowing the campus to be overrun by “mob rule” and appeasing “antisemitic radicals.” Following Shafik’s resignation, Stefanik issued a statement celebrating the news, calling her presidency “untenable.”

Jelani Cobb, Dean of Columbia’s Journalism School, acknowledged the extraordinary challenges Shafik faced, describing this past year as one of the most tumultuous in the university’s recent history. Cobb noted that Armstrong, the interim president, is highly regarded within the Columbia community for her straightforward leadership style.

Jeanine D’Armiento, a professor at Columbia’s medical school and chair of the University Senate’s executive committee, expressed confidence in the university’s future, saying, “We were preparing all summer collaboratively, and she [Shafik] is just one individual. We’re looking forward to the semester and getting back to the academic work.”

As news of Shafik’s resignation spread, reactions among students were mixed. Cameron Jones, a junior and lead organizer with Jewish Voice for Peace, viewed the resignation as a victory for student activism and vowed to continue advocating for the Palestinian cause.

Conversely, Elisha Baker, a co-chair of the pro-Israel group Aryeh, hopes Columbia’s new leadership will enforce stricter regulations on campus protests, potentially including rules on where and when demonstrations can occur and policies to prevent protesters from masking their identities.

As Columbia prepares for the upcoming academic year, the university community remains in a state of reflection and anticipation, with many hoping for a smoother path forward under new leadership.

 2.9 Billion Records, Including Social Security Numbers, Compromised in Massive Data Hack: Key Details

A staggering number of Social Security numbers and other sensitive information belonging to millions of people may now be in the hands of a hacking group following a significant data breach. The Los Angeles Times reported this week that the compromised data might have been sold on an online marketplace.

The hacking group, known as USDoD, allegedly stole personal records of 2.9 billion individuals from National Public Data, according to a class-action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, as reported by Bloomberg Law. The breach is believed to have occurred around April 2024, according to the lawsuit.

Here’s what you need to know about the alleged data breach:

What Information Was Compromised?

The law firm Schubert, Jonckheer & Kolbe, which filed the class-action suit, stated in a press release that the stolen data file is 277.1 gigabytes in size and contains names, address histories, family connections, and Social Security numbers dating back at least three decades.

According to a cybersecurity expert’s post on X (formerly known as Twitter), the group USDoD claims to be selling the 2.9 billion records of U.S., U.K., and Canadian citizens on the dark web for $3.5 million.

Since the data was put up for sale in April, other versions of the data have surfaced, according to the cybersecurity and technology website Bleeping Computer.

In August, a hacker known as "Fenice" reportedly released the most comprehensive version of the data for free on an online forum, Bleeping Computer reported.

What is National Public Data?

National Public Data is a background check company based in Florida and operated by Jerico Pictures, Inc.

While National Public Data has not publicly confirmed the breach, The Los Angeles Times reported that the company has been responding to inquiries via email, stating, "We are aware of certain third-party claims about consumer data and are investigating these issues."